#Nikon scan manual full

Most cases of camera slide copy operations will require a crop of each finished copy to set precise borders. However, other plans not using the ES-1 should work with any focal length at any distance. That might still be conceivable if enough added extension (several inches) is possible, but that doesn't seem a common plan. The ES-1 will not be suitable for lenses very much longer, for example, not with 90 or 105 mm.

#Nikon scan manual full

Said again: The ES-1 is designed for a 55 mm macro lens at 1:1 on a full frame camera. And there are other slide copy attachments, which include a 10x diopter single element magnifying lens, to work with regular zoom lenses, but a true macro lens will be optically superior. However, several other types of setups (without an ES-1) can easily work if you can make a way to hold the slide to aim any macro lens at it, with the slide evenly lighted from the rear. This extension length prohibits a longer lens with the ES-1. An APS cropped sensor body (crop factor 1.5) can use the ES-1 with 40 to 60 mm macro lenses, but possibly needing a proper short extender tube (below). Most other film sizes or longer lenses will require other setups to fill the frame properly.

It is for 35 mm slides, and is designed for a 55 mm 1:1 macro lens and a full frame body (crop factor 1). The ES-1 is NOT a requirement to copy slides. The ES-2 is about double price of the ES-1, handheld the ES-1 should easily do mounted 35 mm slides fully as well (but cropped sensor bodies will need to add additional extension with either copier). Any full frame body should do slides the same (or B&W negatives too, easily inverted in an editor). But it does mean a full frame body (unless extra extension is used as described here). The ES-2 is said to be designed for the D850 camera, obviously because the D850 has a direct color negative inversion mode, explaining the reason for the provided film strip holder. The extension needed for the ES-2 possibly might be a little different than the ES-1. The ES-1 and 40 mm lens was just about right for a cropped sensor body. Using a proper extension with this 40 mm DX lens on a full frame body to extend the holder further out would not crop, but then it will be a smaller image, about 2/3 size, just right for a cropped sensor, but which cannot then fill a full frame sensor. My guess is this is significantly understated for a DX lens on a full frame body at 1:1 (but extra extension can always be added as a complete solution for the 40 mm or 60mm lenses on bodies with cropped sensors. The ES-2 user sheet says the 40 mm lens will 'crop the edges' when used on a full frame body. The Nikon 40 mm lens will fit the 52mm threads, but it is a DX lens, which we are unlikely to own for a full frame camera. The ES-2 also has 52 mm threads, and provides two 62 mm thread adapters which work on the full frame camera with both old and new Nikon 60 mm macro lens (the ES-1 does not provide the thread adapters). Both the ES-1 and ES-2 are designed for a full frame camera, and extra extension as described below is needed for both of them if used on the 1.5x or 1.6x crop bodies (the same issue either way).

I have not used the newer ES-2, I have only looked at its user sheet online. $60 may seem expensive for a slide holder, but the job it does is about priceless. This macro lens will be optically superior to a 10x diopter close up filter on a regular zoom lens. Adding an extension (between the lens and ES-1) lets it work on a cropped sensor DSLR. The ES-1 is an empty tube, a slide holder which contains no glass lens, and is designed to hold the slide in front of a 1:1 macro lens (designed for 55 mm focal length on a full frame body). To work on a DX camera (1.5x crop), the setup as shown also requires an extra 20 mm extension tube between lens and ES-1 (shown, but not included).

TheВ ES-1В fitsВ a 52 mm lens filter thread, or a suitable adapter there. It was one thing to sit down one evening with one roll of slides, but it's something entirely different to be facing a few thousand old slides. But the camera is fast, and great for slides. And some film scanners offer an infrared dust and scratch cleaning feature (often named Digital ICE or FARE) that the camera cannot do, which is extremely useful, but it adds even more time (and may be unsuitable for silver-based Kodachrome slides). The digital camera (with a macro lens) can copy slides very well (and fast), but a real film scanner can be better for color negatives (with the film holders, and better quality for removal of the orange mask, on another page). The Nikon 5000 film scanner did have its SF-210 Auto Slide Feeder accessory ($450) for overnight runs of 50 slides, if it doesn't jam. You may do well to average 10 slides per hour overall, so thousands of slides may take many months, and it's a good bet that you may never finish.

Film scanners are very good, but are also very slow.